Look at old game film highlights and you will never see a catch overturned that way. When [an offensive] player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. [1] The Broncos eventually went on to win the game. The fact that so many Raider fans are still this upset tells me that things have evened out for that bad call in 1976. The officials rule fumble. how many times has the tuck rule been called If the Raiders pull out the Tuck Rule game, they are probably losing one of their next two games, and doing so in embarrassing fashion. Sometimes you have to look past the ignorant terms and complex meanings inside a rule book and watch the damn play. That Tuck Rule loss to the Patriots may have paralyzed your franchise. If the ball lands to the side of, or behind the QB, its a fumble / backwards pass. If your loser team was that great why couldnt they stop the drives after the tuck play ? The final was Gruden's last game of his first stint as head coach of the Raiders; he was traded to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers before the following season. How about this for a rule: you lose the ball it is a fumble. Commentary on this game did not end after the season, the "Tuck Rule Game" has been debated since, with many, possibly even Brady, calling it a fumble. As a Patriots fan, I also support a rule change. Two class of HatersOne class that likes challenging Raider fans and pointing out the many trials and tribulations of their team and complete morons. Losing on a fluke (and possibly bad) call is much more. [1] Broncos quarterback Jake Plummer lost the football while in the Broncos' own end zone. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.[1]. elyasm, the arm doesnt even have to be moving forward at the time the ball is knocked out to make it an incomplete pass. The Raiderswent 10-6 and would have had to go on the road to Pittsburgh against the No. For that matter, neither do most sports writers. Cant have that! The Jets tied the game with a field goal on that drive before going on to win 10-3. The end of Tom Brady's long career arrived Tuesday as the seven-time Super Bowl champion announced his retirement from the NFL after 22 years. At least not right away. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It would make interpretation way more clear. According Paragraph 3036 of Marine Corps Order P1020.34G, which governs uniform regulations, wearing an olive-drab undershirt while in cammies is optional, though in the case of parades . I love how people give the raiders so much attention. I am so sick of hearing about the tuck rule. After a video-replay review, referee Walt Coleman reversed the call, declaring the play an incomplete forward-pass and giving possession back to New England. Now focus on getting rid of your insane owner. The tuck rule came up three times in the final week of the regular season. Other football associations rule it an incomplete pass or a fumble. For one, do you know anything about football? Anything else? In March 2013, the NFL competition committee proposed that league owners eliminate the tuck rule. I have done this and Woodson blitzed off the corner, forced a fumble and greg beikert recovered it winning the game for the Raiders. The call was overturned upon review and ruled an incomplete pass, with the tuck rule cited. Repeat three to five times. The rule, applied to game play, makes absolutely no sense. if it was brady or peyton there never would of been this statement. [3] The call was overturned upon review and ruled an incomplete pass, with the tuck rule cited. (This was also the game in which Patriots quarterback Drew Bledsoe was injured by a hit from Mo Lewis, giving backup Tom Brady a chance to play.). That ref had money on the game so he made up a rule. Losing on a fluke (and possibly bad) call is much more palatable than getting blown out. The Tuck Rule Victoria Saeli Sports 4.9 29 Ratings; A weekly football podcast hosted by Victoria (@dirtbagqueer) and Katie (@KatesOfHeaven). The nation was still recovering from 9/11. Also the fact that Pereria had to struggle with defending it FOR THE LAST TEN YEARS after the fact before finally COMING CLEAN only goes to prove the point that the Tuck Rule is a BAD rule (sorry Harrisonhits2 your logic above is as bad as usually). Not a member? The officials initially called the play a recovered fumble, which would have sealed the victory for the Raiders. To say that the Raiders simply were beaten by the Patriots is one of the stupidest things I have ever read. Its all very fascinating but a tremendous waste of time. You must be logged in to leave a comment. January 16, 2019 10:09 pm PT. The rule not only changed how referees call the game, but it also altered the trajectory of TB12's career, according to . Gruden made a reference to the Tuck Rule game in his introductory press conference upon his return to the Raiders, turning to former Raiders cornerback Charles Woodson and saying "Brady fumbled that ball". I don't understand the denial around this by pats fans, you got a bullshit call go your way, it happens, but you deny it and even call it the game the fucking "snow bowl" while the entire NFL calls it the tuck rule game. Though honestly, if the Patriots win it all this year, Ill be way over that as well. . Since then, the match has been known as the 'Tuck Rule Game'. Bill Belichick should have to insult three teams in a season, one must be in the AFC East. I know this play has caused Raider fans and many other fans significant consternation over the years. The tuck rule was a controversial rule in American football used by the National Football League from 1999 until 2013. And even Marshall Faulk started to decline after that 2001 season. The Raiders appeared to be dominating to this point of the game. sick and tired of Pereira, self-promoting pompous a$$, he would support such a change who cares. 20 years later, the Tuck Rule remains one of the biggest and most polarizing moments in NFL history. A backward pass = fumble. Jan 11, 2011 1:09 PM Walt Coleman hasn't refereed a single Raiders game since making the "tuck rule" call 17 years ago, a ruling that still reverberates throughout the league on occasion. With the tuck rule the entire motion is covered, so there is no room for the ref to screw it up as a judgement call. Tuck rule or not the raiders got robbed. This is referred to as the tuck rule because the ball leaving the quarterback's hands is considered a forward pass even if the quarterback intends not to pass the ball, but instead continues the forward motion to tuck the ball back into his body. The newest 30 for 30 will, however, be streaming on ESPN+, which is available for $6.99/month,. Jan 11, 2011 12:09 PM As for the Raiders, who are still salty about the call all these years later, their season would have been extended by about one week. Your reasoning is flawed because you are obviously a biased patriot fan who enjoyed rodney harrision and his cheap shots. "[1] Pereira said the rule came up in games about 12 to 15 times per season and explained that despite its unpopularity, the competition committee had been unable to come up with a better rule. raidernationabby the rule is correct. You can whine and moan about the rule all you want, but if Coleman made any other call other than the one he did would have been an injustice. lets 1)reinvent the rule book in the playoffs; 2) use the reinvention to OVERTURN the call on the field; 3) reward a qb who got made a fool out of on the play, and; 4) nullify an excellent defensive play. Raiders were the best team in the NFL from 2000-2003 WOULD OF BEEN LONGER PERHAPS IF IT WASNT FOR THAt SCUMBAG! The Patsies had no timeouts and the Raiders would have simply downed the ball to end the game. The ball should not have to be loose in the act of passing for it to be ruled incomplete. (Of course raiders sold the most merchandise back then and where a very popular team ..the league was not about to put NE in the superbowl they would have lost $$$ at the time). this way its absolutely fair for both teams (given that you can agree that his arm was going forward).. To me problem solved, its intentional grounding. "I volunteer as tribute!", "I want the audience to recognise you when you're in the arena," says Cinna dreamily. It was the right call. Mike Martz proved to be a bad NFL head coach. If you watch the replay of Cassels arm (or Bradys for that matter) you can clearly see that his arm is moving forward when he loses possession. In explaining the reversal to the crowd, Coleman stated that the ball was moving forward at the time it was dropped. More like the Raiders started getting worn down near the end of the game, couldnt stop the Patriots offense or convert key third downs when it mattered. Thus, I dont need the BS of Patsies. A pass should only be ruled incomplete if the ball comes loose in the actual act of passing the ball. Bullshit. Never mind. [8], This was not the first time the Patriots had seen the tuck rule invoked in the 2001 NFL season. Brady was patting the ball. Im sure its no consolation to the many Raiders fans around the country.. Afterwards, referring obliquely to the 2002 Tuck Rule Game, Patriots owner Robert Kraft said, "I love the tuck rule, and forever will, and I know [longtime Raiders owner] Al Davis, may he rest in peace, is probably smiling. Fact is, the refs blew that call and then the league tried to justify it by making a made-up interpretation of the rule. Dip up, Hyacinth bulbs contain oxalic acid, which is poisonous. Now days it would be a hands to the face (hitting the quarterback in the head) penalty (15 yds) which is a little better than the incompletion I think. Blame the ones that make the rules- Perreira does a great job explaining the stupid a$$ sh!t. And as for this clown harrisonhits2 says: Jan 11, 2011 12:11 PM. (GIF) : nfl. After this game, Mike Pereira, the former NFL vice-president for officiating, stated that he was no longer in support of the tuck rule.[6]. I think that the play 10 years ago should have been a fumble. That has to be the dumbest rule in the book. The season had been wild for the Patriots, who began the year 02 after veteran quarterback Drew Bledsoe suffered a sheared blood vessel in his chest[6] in the game against the New York Jets. There was less than 2 min left in the game when that fumble happened Unlikely the Pats wouldve gotten the ball back. Photos (and replay) clearly show Brady with both hands on the ball before its knocked out. What in the hell caused the NFL to make up such a stupid rule in the first place? PRIDE AND POISE RAIDER NATION After he had begun a passing motion, Brady clearly ceased his throwing motion, pulled his right hand down below his shoulder and had touched the ball to his left hand when, coming off the strong side corner blitz, Charles Woodson knocked the ball out of Brady's hands. However, in the fourth quarter, Brady led the Patriots on a 10-play, 67-yard drive, completing nine consecutive passes for 61 yards and finishing it with a 6-yard touchdown run with 7:57 left that made the score 1310. But its not as if St. Louis would have replaced New England as the NFLs most successful organization. You had your chance the next season, and the Bucs beat you by 50 touchdowns Brady posted his confession on social media, rekindling a. The Raiders were robbed of another shot at the AFC title and a potential trip to the suber bowl. - periera is an idiotit was wrong then and just now he realizes it? It was a pump fake that he brought back to his body. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. The NFL defended the call, but Bruce Allen, who ran the front office for the Raiders at the time of the game, said, "The rule itself doesn't bother me, but the way the rule is written, it was a fumble. Patriots kicker Adam Vinatieri later tied the game with a 45-yard field goal; in overtime, the Patriots defeated the Raiders on another field goal. The Patriots went on to defeat the Pittsburgh Steelers, 2417, in the AFC Championship Game, and then defeated the NFC champions St. Louis Rams, 2017, in the February 2, 2002 Super Bowl XXXVI on a last-second field goal by Vinatieri. Any ref that cannot see that Woodson clocked Brady in the side of the head causing him to lose possession should not have a job as a ref. raidernationbaby says: That is not a tucking motion That is already tucked. Tom Brady enjoyed a phenomenal 20 seasons with the New England Patriots.With a tenure that long, the future Hall of Fame quarterback made countless memories with the franchise. Only one of the Patriots 12 balls was underinflated by two pounds, according to the report. As a Patriots fan, I always thought it was a bad rule and wished it were changed, but I also want the refs to follow the rules rather than making stuff up to call. Some may find it surprising that many of the leagues passes target players behind the line of scrimmage. The call against the Raiders was not the tuck rule. He did, New England won and Brady went on to forge an NFL dynasty. And having the help of replay, the ref ref who overturned the fumble should have been fired on the spot. No . They say time heals everything, but this is still a touchy subject for the Raiders and their fans. It's the way it's worded. Duh. Patriots should have had 1st and 10 with an extra 15 yards. Raiders defensive backCharles Woodson tackled Brady, causing the ball to land on the field and allowing Oakland linebacker Greg Biekert to recover the football. people dont realize after that turnover the very next play would be a 3 kneeldowns and the game over, # http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/14/AR2005101401828_2.html. Well guess what, the raiders won the game when Woodson forced the fumble and Beikert fell on it. Cassells was the real tuck rule. I think everybody probably sees that and says it's a bad rule. The Tuck Rule rules that his pass was incomplete. A lot of people see the incident as one of the NFLs great what ifs. but hey, at least they didnt bring out the snow plow for their FG attempt-or did they?? I love how people act like the Pats won against the Raiders only because of the tuck rule. Yet they did. Unfortunately, The Tuck Rule won't be available for next-day streaming via Watch ESPN. Jan 11, 2011 3:17 PM In it's place, the following was added to the rule book: "If the player loses possession of the ball during an attempt to bring it back toward his body, or if the player loses possession after he has tucked the ball into his body, it is a fumble. After review. In the aftermath of the Tuck Rule Game, Patriots head coach Bill Belichick told ESPN, "I knew what the ruling should have been because we had dealt with that play a little bit earlier in the year on the other side of it. I would support a rule change, although it took me a long time to get to this point, Pereira said. Oh no, wait, Steelers fans would lose out then. "The Tuck Rule Game." The ruling: an incomplete pass. Brady himself admitted that if it weren't for the ruling, which was abolished in 2014 - today, if a player motions for a forward pass and loses possession, it is ruled a fumble - he would have. Geeze the moron Raider fans really come out over the tuck rule. In Week 17 an incredible three games featured an example of these . Tweet text can contain up to 280 characters or Unicode glyphs in the majority of cases. "The five most significant plays in recent NFL history", "The NFL's 10 Greatest Postseason Games of the 2000s", "NFL rescinds 'tuck rule' The Boston Globe", "New York Jets at New England Patriots - September 23rd, 2001 - Pro-Football-Reference.com", "Holy Tuck: An oral history of the Raiders-Patriots Tuck Rule Game, which 15 years ago forever altered the NFL", "Best kick ever? Is the tuck rule, on the other hand, still in effect? So get over it, Charles Woodson. This is Bill Belichick were talking about; how many high-priced veterans have we seen him cast away from New England? A source told Ian Rapoport on Wednesday that the elimination of the "Tuck Rule" passed overwhelmingly at the NFL Annual Meeting in Phoenix. Uhh, I do believe it does make sense for the QB to be in the act of passing for it to be ruled an incomplete pass. Pulling the ball back is not passing and should be no different then a running back not securing the ball and getting it stripped away. Officials overturned the fumble call, invoking the Tuck Rule, which currently says that if a quarterback has started his arm forward for a forward pass, even if he loses control of the ball. The Raiders went to the Super Bowl the next year, but were beaten by Gruden's Buccaneers, 4821 and the Raiders did not make the playoffs again until 2016. Brady, who recently announced his retirement, is now a seven-time Super Bowl champion who . The Tuck Rule was first enforced in 2001 when Vinny Testaverde faced the Patriots. The tuck rule is a smart rule, designed to eliminate controversy, and make it so officials dont have to spend time deciding what the intention of the thrower is. Also, when did the tuck rule go away? On January 19, 2002, NFL history was changed forever. worst call in history of sports.
System Software Includes All Of The Following Except:,
Articles H